The Trading Pit is a global proprietary trading firm that provides structured evaluation programs and funded trading accounts to customers across multiple markets and regions. Its model is rules-driven by design, with clear criteria around challenges, drawdowns, payouts, and platform usage.
As the platform scaled, customer support volume increased alongside it. Most inbound queries were not complex, but they were frequent and time-sensitive, often tied to understanding rules, account status, or next steps. While answers existed across documentation and FAQs, they were not always surfaced fast enough or consistently at the moment support was needed.
To avoid scaling support purely through headcount and to maintain consistent responses at scale, The Trading Pit adopted HubSpot Customer Agent as a frontline support layer, using automation to handle high-volume queries and route only exceptions to human agents.
Scaling created opportunity, but implementing automation raised new questions.
As The Trading Pit explored using Customer Agent to handle frontline support, several practical challenges surfaced:
These challenges needed to be addressed before Customer Agent could operate as a reliable frontline support layer.
The Trading Pit rolled out HubSpot Customer Agent as part of their support operating model across channels. The goal was to handle high-volume questions immediately, keep response timelines predictable, and create a clear escalation path for anything that required human involvement.
Support volume came in through multiple entry points, so the deployment covered both of the places customers actually use. Customer Agent was configured for:
This let the same knowledge base and response logic serve both channels while keeping reporting clean by channel account.
The support workflow was built around a clear time expectation so conversations did not linger. They aligned the process to:
This gave the team a consistent definition of what “on track” and “at risk” looked like.
Cases that crossed the escalation threshold were handled through automatic ownership assignment and notifications. When a conversation or ticket went beyond 72 hours:
This created a predictable safety net for edge cases and prevented silent backlog build up.
Customer Agent handled the first pass for most conversations and routed complex requests into human assignment when required. The handoff flow was structured so:
This allowed automation to cover volume while humans handled the exceptions.
Edge cases were treated as a defined set of categories with clear routing behavior. Typical cases routed to humans included:
This kept responses accurate while maintaining momentum for routine queries.
The knowledge base was maintained as a living layer connected to support performance. They used reporting signals to:
This made the system stronger as new scenarios emerged.
By combining Customer Agent across chat and email with SLA timelines, time-based escalation, and structured handoffs, The Trading Pit turned support into a repeatable system that could keep pace with volume while maintaining clear ownership for complex cases.
Here’s what changed after The Trading Pit strengthened how HubSpot Customer Agent was deployed and supported with a deeper Knowledge Hub:
This happened without changing where customers reached out or how the support team operated day to day.
The focus now is on expanding knowledge coverage for edge cases, reducing unnecessary handoffs, and tightening response quality for the scenarios that still require human intervention.
Want this setup in your HubSpot portal?
Book a support automation teardown →